creative_commons
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— | creative_commons [2025/09/13 08:11] (current) – created 1gn15 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Creative Commons ====== | ||
+ | ======= Why I Don't Use Creative Commons Licenses ======= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Creative Commons has an issue. It endorses nonfree licenses. Officially, it says that they wish for nonfree licenses to be stepping stones to free licenses. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But in practice, that doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The organisation' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Misunderestimating Openness ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to AI (of course), the organization has had a push recently to redefine openness. They now want to focus on equity, and reciprocity. Sounds good, but it's not about openness and freedom. By focusing on contradictory goals, seemingly as a knee-jerk reaction to AI, they risk destroying the very foundation of their organisation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, they advocated for "AI preferences" | ||
+ | |||
+ | Amy also lamented being prevented from enforcing their preferences on AI on their readers because of the Creative Commons license they use, that prevents creators from putting more restrictions on users. I'm not sure how they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== What I Am Doing ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Because of these two, I have a pretty low opinion of the Creative Commons organization nowadays. I opt to use the Free Art License instead. It's inspired by the GPL, so it's a free, attribution-sharealike license, with no option to add other restrictions. Perfect! And the brand isn't polluted by being associated with nonfree licenses. |
creative_commons.txt · Last modified: by 1gn15