Continue.Dev: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== Older Versions are Better == Not to harp on the devs too much, it is a FOSS project after all, but the old versions (pre-1.0) are just so, so much better than the new ones, if you don't care about agentic AI too much. It's much stabler, autocomplete is much faster and more reliant, and in general it just works well with local AI for the GPU-poor (e.g. by using indexing instead of agentic, which local smaller LLMs might still struggle with)." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Older Versions are Better == | == Older Versions are Better == | ||
Not to harp on the devs too much, it is a FOSS project after all, but the old versions (pre-1.0) are just so, so much better than the new ones, if you don't care about agentic AI too much. It's much stabler, autocomplete is much faster and more reliant, and in general it just works well with local AI for the GPU-poor (e.g. by using indexing instead of agentic, which local smaller LLMs might still struggle with). | Not to harp on the devs too much, it is a FOSS project after all, but the old versions (pre-1.0) are just so, so much better than the new ones, if you don't care about agentic AI too much (and honestly, for those, just use [[Roo Code]]). It's much stabler, autocomplete is much faster and more reliant, and in general it just works well with local AI for the GPU-poor (e.g. by using indexing instead of agentic, which local smaller LLMs might still struggle with). | ||
Revision as of 14:32, 19 January 2026
Older Versions are Better
Not to harp on the devs too much, it is a FOSS project after all, but the old versions (pre-1.0) are just so, so much better than the new ones, if you don't care about agentic AI too much (and honestly, for those, just use Roo Code). It's much stabler, autocomplete is much faster and more reliant, and in general it just works well with local AI for the GPU-poor (e.g. by using indexing instead of agentic, which local smaller LLMs might still struggle with).